One indication of progress: $15 billion in arms export agreements signed between 20. This systematic explication enhances the credibility and utility of the 145-page report. But what most of its most avid consumers really want to know is: How good is the military hardware that China can produce? And how do performance parameters and quality vary by type of weapon system? It is in the totality of such information that the report really shines. However, in meeting its obligations to Congress, and, by extension, the public, the Pentagon’s annual report had to address a wide range of disparate issues concerning Chinese military and security development. It had to do so in a format largely shaped by its previous 14 iterations. I have worked here to distill insights into just how good various types of Chinese military hardware have become.Ĭomprehensiveness, Converging Sectors, and Remaining Gaps Allow me, therefore, to summarize and reconfigure its key findings to best address these pressing questions. Observers of China’s defense industry have long noted a hierarchy of proficiency across its subsectors.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |